Prior art found on '304 MagnaCross patent

Unified is pleased to announce prior art has been found on U.S. Patent 6,917,304. This patent is owed by MagnaCross, LLC, an IP Edge entity and well-known NPE. The ’304 patent generally relates to wireless data transmission through wireless access points or routers and has been asserted in over 100 litigations against many networking companies, including T-Mobile, Sprint, Acer, Logitech, and ZTE. Prior art search service provider, Parola Analytics, found the art shown below.

We would also like to thank the dozens of other high-quality submissions that were made on this patent. The ongoing contests are open to anyone, and include tens of thousands of dollars in rewards available for helping the industry to challenge NPE patents of questionable validity by finding and submitting prior art in the contests. Visit PATROLL today to learn more about how to participate.

WINNING SUBMISSION

U.S. Semiconductor Industry Confronts a Two-Front War

Semiconductor fabrication in the United States has been on the wane for years.  This resulted in the current microchip shortage.  Nonetheless, as legislation is being debated to add incentives for semiconductor manufacturing in the United States, several companies have already begun to increase their efforts.  Intel recently announced in March that it would build two chip plants in Arizona, and TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company) also announced it is opening a plant there as well. Reportedly totalling USD $32 Billion, these projects are at least in part an attempt to address the ever growing chip shortage that is affecting many industries. 

For example, the chip shortages recently hit automotive manufacturing hard. As car dealerships run out of inventory, many vehicles are stuck at the assembly lines, virtually completed and simply awaiting a chip or two. It seems that the perfect storm of a long pandemic, a brief recession, and an unanticipated increase in demand for chips in personal devices spurred by a remote-based work environment all contributed to the chip shortage in many industries, including automotive manufacturing. 

But there is another storm sweeping over semiconductors in the United States. Just as companies begin efforts to address the chip shortages, patent litigation related to semiconductors is on the rise.  In particular, non-practicing entities (NPEs) are bringing a major portion of semiconductor patent litigation, fueled largely by an influx of litigation financing into the once-aloof area. Indeed, while overall litigation is expected to see a slight drop (mostly attributed to operating companies focusing on recovery rather than rapacity), with a 42% decrease from 2019 to 2020, semiconductor litigation has risen steadily for the past three years, and could overtake last year’s all-time high if the threatened clouds break.

That increase in litigation is driven by increased non-practicing entity (NPE) suits in the semiconductor space. Indeed, the NPE litigation accounted for nearly 80% of all litigation in 2021, a 7% increase from 2020, and is set to rise, given the selloffs of major semiconductor portfolios owned by Intellectual Ventures, LG, and other large patent holders.

This is in stark contrast to the industry’s rise in the 80s and 90s, when operating companies fought large cross-licensing battles. Now, the litigation landscape is dominated by NPEs. Overall, NPEs have accounted for nearly 75% of all semiconductor litigation over the past five years.

And recently, the NPEs have been backed by a new breed of moneymaker, with 52.4% of all NPE litigation related to a patent aggregator—an entity responsible for multiple patent portfolios litigated through multiple subsidiaries. (NPE aggregators are defined as NPEs that have more than one affiliated subsidiary also bringing patent litigation.)

And third-party financing has found its way to NPE bringing chip-related suits, with 25% of suits being backed by third-party financing—i.e., patent litigation funding from private, unrelated sources. (Third-party financing is defined as any third party with a financial interest supporting the litigation or assertion, other than the assertors themselves.)

This trend can be seen below when looking at the top-10 plaintiffs of 2021, with the financially backed IP Edge bringing 19 separate semiconductor assertion campaigns to date. The much better-funded Vector Capital Corporation and its cohort, however, brought bigger, longer-term litigation targeted for much bigger settlement numbers, and the Fortress IP-backed Netlist reportedly signed a $40 million licensing agreement with SK Hynix; the Magnetar Capital-backed Neodron has reportedly settled for eight figures against multiple defendants, including in the ongoing disputes with Samsung over the scope of potentially related litigation-driven settlement licenses.

The targets of 2021 have generally been either chip manufacturers or, quite frequently, on device manufacturers or product manufacturers whose products nonetheless rely on semiconductors. Not listed above are multiple selloffs from Intellectual Ventures to subsidiaries of Longhorn IP, like Katana Silicon Technologies or Trenchant Blade Technologies, which have immediately been turned around against chip manufacturers and their customers. Perennial NPE Dominion Harbor, listed above, has filed a number of chip-level campaigns. PTAB activity against semiconductor patents is at an all-time high, and even smaller repeat NPEs like the Jon Rowan entities have gotten into the game with their Liberty Patents subsidiary, listed above.

The defendant list above is partially obscured by indemnification requests and suits against consumer-facing end user products, but the representative list above shows that chip manufacturers themselves are seeing a fair number of NPE litigation asserted directly against them on their chips or fabrication processes. Recent suits by companies backed by Magnetar Capital—such as the Arigna suit—target automotive manufacturers, but rely in part on chips and hardware; other suits have originally sued some chip manufacturers, then moved on to the end users. Either way, it is clear that NPEs and litigation financiers are attracted to chip portfolios 

2021 is proving to be a two-front battle for most semiconductor manufacturers. While they actively address the world-wide chip shortage, they are being faced with litigation brought by NPEs that have access to large portfolios and financing. 


Copyright © 2021, Unified Patents, LLC. All rights reserved.

GE Video Compression reexamination request granted

On June 21, 2021, the USPTO granted Unified’s request, finding substantial new questions of patentability on all challenged claims of U.S. Patent 6,795,583 owned by GE Video Compression LLC (GEVC). The ‘583 patent is purportedly essential to the H.265 and AV1 standards and is part of the HEVC Advance patent pool as well as SISVEL’s video codec patent pool.

Unified is represented by Theodoros Konstantakopoulos and Christian Dorman of Desmarais, and in-house counsel, Ashraf Fawzy and Jessica L.A. Marks, in this proceeding. Visit Unified’s Public Portal for more information about its Video Codec landscape (OPAL) and standard submission repository (OPEN).

To view any documents for the reexamination proceedings on PAIR, go to https://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair, enter 90/014,743, and click on the "Image File Wrapper" tab.

Transport Zone Update: NPE litigation rate has nearly doubled since 2019

Since 2019, NPE-related Transport litigation has jumped from 41% to 77% overall in this zone.

While the overall zone litigation is estimated to slightly decrease from 2020, NPE-related litigation has increased by 6% to 77%, reaching 2015 and 2016 levels.

Transport manufacturers continue to be the main targets of litigation. These manufacturers comprise 62% of all first-named defendants. Manufacturers are defined as companies that are OEMs such as Toyota, Honda, Ford, and Tesla. Dealerships are defined as a company that primarily sells for the manufacturer. These would include Kinsel Ford and Zimbrick Honda. Suppliers are companies such as Denso,  Bosch Automotive, ABB, and even Uber that provide components or services. 


Analyzing the data, first-named defendants there appears to be a renewed interest in manufacturers, rather than just suppliers. For instance, a case in South Carolina names Motorola as the first-named defendant. However, several manufacturers and dealers appear on the complaint as well, such as FCA, Ford Global Technologies, LLC, Big O Dodge Chrysler Jeep Ram, Kevin Whitaker Chevrolet, Fairway Ford Lincoln of Greenville, and General Motors.

The top-five plaintiffs in 2021 are all NPEs and account for 73% (25 of 34) of litigation cases brought so far this year. The top-five plaintiffs are:

Top-5 Plaintiffs Cases
Blitzsafe Texas (NPE) 8
Display Technologies (NPE) 5
Typhoon IP (NPE) 4
MicroPairing Technologies (NPE) 4
Arigna Technology (NPE) 4

They appear to target Manufacturers rather than Suppliers. Companies like BMW, GM, Porsche, Honda, and Namsung saw themselves as first-named defendants twice in 2021. But it appears that NPEs are attacking any Manufacturer with AB Volvo, Daimler, Ford, Harley Davidson, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Toyota, and Volkswagen with 1 assertion against.

DEFENDING AGAINST NON-NPEs

It's increasingly more important that manufacturers bolster their patent portfolios as litigation increasingly becomes focused on vehicle connectivity and electronics as many larger companies such as Nokia  and others have begun to assert. Companies can improve their portfolio using proprietary tools such as Unified’s LPIX to choose more successful counsel. 


For instance, art units in 3660’s deal with Computerized Vehicle Controls and Navigation. Art Unit 3661 is by far the most utilized art unit with 23,423 applications and a 86.6% allowance rate. When looking at a specific law firm, Sughrue Mion is the highest performing in terms of LPIX. They have above the art unit average of 89.5% and have handled 198 applications with a low pendency time. The top-10 performing law firms can be seen below.

Law Firm LPIX Allowance Rate #Apps Pendency Narrowness
Sughrue Mion PLLC 100.00% 89.50% 198 1.9851 22.5072
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP 95.20% 85.60% 202 2.2204 21.441
Oliff PLC 94.80% 84.90% 249 2.3176 23.7611
Mintz Levin 86.90% 87.60% 129 2.2743 18.4138
Norton Rose Fulbright 85.50% 95.20% 95 2.3669 16.3289
Crowell & Moring LLP 81.90% 87.00% 133 2.2345 21.4216
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP 78.90% 91.00% 99 1.6961 23.1912
Fish & Richardson 76.90% 88.90% 96 2.3322 18.479
Brooks Kushman 75.50% 83.20% 129 2.7086 19.056
BakerHostetler 75.00% 92.10% 71 2.094 16.7505

When collectively looking at all the 3660’s art units, the top-20 law firms can be seen below.

Law Firm #Apps LPIX Rank
Sughrue Mion PLLC 1326 100.00% 1
Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP 1303 100.00% 2
Oliff PLC 1488 100.00% 3
Mcdonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP 541 100.00% 4
Mintz Levin 819 86.90% 5
Norton Rose Fulbright 671 85.50% 6
Harness, Dickey & Pierce PLC 928 82.10% 7
Crowell & Moring LLP 773 81.90% 8
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP 562 78.90% 9
Global IP Counselors LLP 424 77.50% 10
Hauptman Ham LLP 341 77.20% 11
Fish & Richardson 538 76.90% 12
Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 519 75.50% 13
Brooks Kushman 824 75.50% 14
BakerHostetler LLP 384 75.00% 15
Mcdermott Will & Emery LLP 563 74.30% 16
Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP 496 73.00% 17
Cantor Colburn LLP 577 72.80% 18
Foley & Lardner LLP 542 72.60% 19
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP 387 72.30% 20

LPIX not only allows to see how a particular art unit is handled by a law firm, but is able to see performance collectively to allow companies to make smart decisions regarding their portfolio prosecution


METHODOLOGY

Unified looked at all major Transport manufacturers and the top 10 Transport suppliers by revenue since 2012.

Total number of reported cases can vary. Unified made its best attempt to eliminate mistaken or duplicative filings.

Statistics include litigations initiated by NPEs or Declaratory Judgments (DJs) initiated by operating companies against NPEs.

Unified strives to accurately identify NPE activity through all available means, such as court filings, public documents, and product documentation.

LEGEND

Non Practicing Entity (NPE) = Company which derives the majority of its total revenue from Patent Licensing activities.

Operating Company or Op. Co. = Company which derives most of its total revenue from Product Sales or Services. Could be an SME or a large company.

NPE (Patent Assertion Entities) = Entity whose primary activity is licensing patents and acquired most of its patents from another entity

NPE (Small Company) = Entity whose original activity was providing products and services, but now is primarily focused on monetizing its own patent portfolio.

NPE (Individual) = Entity owned or controlled by an individual inventor who is primarily focused on monetizing inventions patents by that individual inventor.


Copyright © 2021, Unified Patents, LLC. All rights reserved.

Webinar Materials - Who is Gaming Who? Why 5G Self-Declarations Have Exploded & What To Do About It

Speakers:

Craig Thompson — General Manager & COO, Unified Consulting

Matthias Schneider — Chief Licensing Officer, AUDI AG

The 5G SEP self-declared landscape has exploded over the past 2 years. The number of self-declared 5G SEP families has grown 275% since 5G Release 15 was frozen mid-2019. Meanwhile, the number of technical contributions to the 5G standard has grown only 40% during the same time frame. Craig Thompson, Unified Consulting's General Manager, and Matthias Schneider, Audi's Chief Licensing Officer, interpret the latest 5G SEP self-declaration data and explore the relationship between 5G standard technical contributions and 5G SEP self-declarations.

Thank you to Craig and Matthias for a great discussion! Lots of questions during this event!!

To listen to the recorded webinar, click here: https://vimeo.com/566228979

Stay tuned for more details on our next webinar in July!