$2,000 for Indieriser creative content patent prior art

Unified Patents added a new PATROLL contest, with a $2,000 cash prize, seeking prior art on at least claim 1 of U.S. Patent 7,921,028, owned by Indieriser LLC, an NPE. The '028 patent describes an online brokerage system for creative content that connects creators, reviewers, and potential commercial partners.

The contest will expire on November 30, 2026. Please visit PATROLL for more information and to submit an entry for the contest. PATROLL researchers are required to use Pearl to generate claim charts. Submitted invalidity charts must address every limitation of the challenged claim. This may require using more than one prior art reference. Each PATROLL researcher can generate up to 30 invalidity claim charts per month using Pearl. These charts can be downloaded then submitted to PATROLL.

$2,000 for Innovations In Memory patent prior art

Unified Patents added a new PATROLL contest, with a $2,000 cash prize, seeking prior art on at least claim 1 of U.S. Patent 8,285,961, owned and asserted by owned by Innovations In Memory LLC, an NPE. The '961 patent describes a dynamic allocation of faster storage resources to meet performance targets. The patent has been asserted against IBM and others.

The contest will expire on November 30, 2026. Please visit PATROLL for more information and to submit an entry for the contest. PATROLL researchers are required to use Pearl to generate claim charts. Submitted invalidity charts must address every limitation of the challenged claim. This may require using more than one prior art reference. Each PATROLL researcher can generate up to 30 invalidity claim charts per month using Pearl. These charts can be downloaded then submitted to PATROLL.

$2,000 for Multimedia Technologies smart TV patent prior art

Unified Patents added a new PATROLL contest, with a $2,000 cash prize, seeking prior art on at least claim 17 of U.S. Patent 9,185,324, owned and asserted by Multimedia Technologies Pte. Ltd., an NPE and entity of Transpacific IP Group Limited. The '324 patent relates to an intelligent or smart television platform within a broader effort to consolidate home entertainment and connected-device functions. The patent has been used in litigation.

The contest will expire on November 30, 2026. Please visit PATROLL for more information and to submit an entry for the contest. PATROLL researchers are required to use Pearl to generate claim charts. Submitted invalidity charts must address every limitation of the challenged claim. This may require using more than one prior art reference. Each PATROLL researcher can generate up to 30 invalidity claim charts per month using Pearl. These charts can be downloaded then submitted to PATROLL.

Quantefi Wi-Fi patents being investigated

The team at Unified is using Pearl to identify and chart prior art against patents owned by QuanteFi Corporation. The patents describe hybrid antenna-sector selection and beamforming for wireless networks. The patents have been asserted against wireless networking products and services that implement the IEEE 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5), 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6), and 802.11be (Wi-Fi 7) and higher standards. Companies asserted against include Commscope, Belden, and others. For more details, contact info@unifiedpatents.com.

Letter Submission to the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules

Unified Patents submitted a letter to the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules on October 5, 2026. We urged the Advisory Committee to implement a uniform rule requiring disclosure of nonparty litigation funding arrangements and recommended it adopt the proposal currently pending from the Lawyers for Civil Justice (LCJ) and the Institute for Legal Reform (ILR). The proposed amendments to the rule (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26) and comments regarding the same will be discussed at the committee meeting coming up on October 21.

Patent litigation presents a particularly compelling case for such a rule: the “access to justice” rationale sometimes invoked to justify nonparty litigation funder secrecy does not apply to an arms-length litigation practice built on non-practicing assertion vehicles. The prevalence of funding in patent litigation (1 in 4 patent cases are funded) and Judge Connolly's findings during the IP Edge case show what undisclosed TPLF control looks like and how easily it evades existing rules. A clear, uniform disclosure requirement would give courts, defendants, and the public the information they need to evaluate these cases on their merits.

Download the full letter HERE.