Lighthouse "check depositing" patent determined to be likely invalid

On June 9, 2020, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted trial on all challenged claims in an IPR filed by Unified against U.S. Patent 8,590,940, owned and asserted by Lighthouse Consulting Group, an NPE. The ‘940 patent is directed to image-based check depositing technology. Lighthouse has thus far asserted this patent over 30 times since July and over 20 of those cases are still active (not including multiple DJ actions). The defendants in these cases are primarily banks and financial services companies such as Wells Fargo, Citigroup, Charles Schwab, AMEX, Bank of America, Capital One, Morgan Stanley, Ally Financial, JP Morgan, and BB&T. Wells Fargo also filed an IPR petition challenging claims of this patent in April.

Unified is represented by Raghav Bajaj at Haynes and Boone in this proceeding. View Lighthouse's district court litigation. To read the petition and view the entire case proceeding, see Unified's Portal.

Voice Tech Corp patent challenged as likely invalid

On June 5, 2020, Unified filed a petition for inter partes review (IPR) against U.S. Patent 10,491,679, owned by Voice Tech Corp, an NPE. The ’679 patent relates to remotely controlling a computer's operating system and applications using voice commands from a mobile device. The patent is currently asserted against Mycroft AI Inc. for using open source, voice-related technologies.


View Voice Tech Corp’s district court litigation. To read the petition and view the case record, see Unified's Portal. Unified is represented by Unified’s in-house counsel, Jordan Rossen and Roshan Mansinghani, in this proceeding.

200th PTAB challenge filed by Unified

On Friday, May 29, Unified Patents filed its 200th PTAB challenge (you can view them here), roughly seven years since the company first formed. Unified was created at a time of rising patent litigation and at the trailing end of the last economic downturn — litigation largely initiated by non-practicing entities (see historical rates here). At one point, over 90% of all high-tech litigation was initiated by NPEs (2015 report), many of which were using litigation costs to extract settlements. It came with two basic beliefs: first, to never pay NPEs; and second, to challenge bad patents owned by NPEs and seek to deter further investment in serial assertion.

Since its founding, Unified has grown into the third largest patent challenger at the USPTO (including post-grant reviews, ex parte reexams, reissue protests, third party submissions, and inter partes reviews). From a humble living room in Los Altos, Unified has grown from two to over twenty professionals worldwide (team page). It has grown from one zone (i.e., technology area) and six members to nine zones and over 3,000 members (for more, see Zones). Members include some of the largest corporations in the world, as well as, hundreds of startups, open-source developers, and others, many of whom can join for free (here). All members benefit from deterring the investment and assertion of bad patents.

In the interim, NPE litigation has decreased as an overall percentage of suits. In other words, it’s been working (more here). But even with over 200 challenges under our belt, there is much more work left to do to deter bad assertions and improve patent quality. Changes at the PTAB, litigation finance, economic changes, and forum shopping have led to another substantial upswing in NPE litigation. By continuing the fight and continuing to question the validity of broad, widely asserted patents by companies that contribute little to the economy, we hope to continue to create jobs, reduce the drain of nuisance patent litigation on U.S. companies, and effect the policy goals that Congress, the Courts, and the Founders intended.

2BCom patent challenged as likely invalid

On May 29, 2020, Unified filed a petition for inter partes review (IPR) against U.S. Patent 7,127,210, owned by 2BCom, LLC, an NPE. The ’210 patent is generally directed to management of Bluetooth connections and is currently asserted against BMW, TP-Link, FCA, Amazon, and KIA Motors.

View 2BCom’s district court litigation. To read the petition and view the case record, see Unified's Portal.  Unified is represented by Jon Bowser and Angela Oliver of Haynes and Boone in this proceeding.

NavBlazer Patent Challenged as Likely Invalid

On May 29, 2020, Unified filed a petition for inter partes review (IPR) against U.S. Patent 9,885,782, owned by NavBlazer LLC, an NPE. The ’782 patent is generally directed to vehicle navigation systems that provide information about a route (e.g., identifying traffic congestion, weather conditions, etc.). The case against TomTom was terminated earlier this month, but the patent is currently being asserted against Apple, Samsung, LG, Motorola Mobility, and Hyundai for their devices that provide vehicle navigation.

View NavBlazer’s district court litigation. To read the petition and view the case record, see Unified's Portal.  Unified is represented by in-house counsel, Jessica Marks and Ashraf Fawzy, and James Stein from Lee & Hayes in this proceeding.