INPADOC Extended Families can now be searched on Unified's Portal

Unified Patents’ Portal now includes INPADOC Extended families. You can now search by and expand by Extended Family ID.

Or have that information displayed or exported in Portal:

These features are available in the Patent Search portal, as well as OPAL’s IEEE, 3GPP, and Video Codec landscapes, to enable accurate top-down counting and analysis. 

DOCDB simple families typically include a collection of patent applications covering the same technical content.

The charts below describe how a set of patents can have 4 separate simple families. The priorities taken into account are:

  1. First filings - A first filing is a foreign application claimed under the Paris Convention.

  2. Provisional first filings - A provisional first filing is a U.S. provisional application.

  3. Equivalents to first filings - An equivalent to a first filing is a U.S. continuation-in-part.

The concept of a “simple” family excludes:

  • Applications that are a continuation of an existing parent application

  • Applications that are a division of an existing parent application

Continuations and divisions are considered to cover the same technical content as the parent application. Continuations and divisions will always be in a patent family with the parent application, regardless of the priorities that they claim.

Figure 1 - DOCDB SIMPLE FAMILY

Figure 2 - INPADOC EXTENDED FAMILY

(Landscape Study of Potentially Essential Patents Disclosed to ETSI)

An extended patent family is a collection of patent documents covering a technology. The technical content covered by the applications is similar, but not necessarily the same. Members of an extended patent family will have at least one priority in common with at least one other member - either directly or indirectly. Hence, the four families above, become one extended family.

Therefore, the priorities taken into account are:

  • First filings, provisional first filings, and equivalents to first filings (for definitions of these terms, see above)

  • Priorities that refer to an earlier related application, whether a domestic or a PCT filing

Click HERE to see Unified’s INPADOC extended families search capabilities.

Dolby HEVC/AV1 patent revoked in EPO

On January 17, 2024, the European Patent Office announced the revocation of all claims of EP 3798988. The EP ‘988 patent is owned by Dolby International AB and is related to patents that have been declared essential to Access Advance and SISVEL’s AV1 patent pools.

Unified is represented by Harry Hutchinson and Andrew McGettrick at HGF Law, and by in-house counsel, Jessica L.A. Marks and Michelle Aspen.

Acacia entity, Monarch, network routing patent challenge instituted

On January 18, 2024, two months after Unified filed an ex parte reexamination, the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) granted Unified’s request, finding substantial new questions of patentability on the challenged claims of U.S. Patent 8,693,369, owned and asserted by Monarch Networking Solutions, LLC, an Acacia Research Corp. entity. The ‘369 patent relates to routing data packets with the same destination address using port masks. It has been asserted against Cisco and Juniper Networks.

View district court litigations by Monarch Networking. Unified is represented by Joseph English, Patrick Muldoon, and John Baird at Duane Morris and by in-house counsel, Jordan Rossen and Alyssa Holtslander, in this proceeding.

To view the reexamination request, visit Unified’s Portal: https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/exparte/90015315

Anonymous Media ad measurement patent challenged

On January 16, 2024, Unified Patents filed an ex parte reexamination proceeding against U.S. Patent 8,510,768, owned by Anonymous Media Research Holdings, LLC. The ‘768 patent relates to media monitoring and measurement systems for automatic content recognition (ACR) to, for example, measure viewership on Smart TVs. The patent has been asserted against Samsung and Roku.

View district court litigations by Anonymous Media Research. Unified is represented by Wolf Greenfield & Sacks, and by in-house counsel, Jordan Rossen and Roshan Mansinghani.

Atlantic IP entity Lionra cybersecurity patent challenged

On January 18, 2024, Unified Patents filed an ex parte reexamination proceeding against U.S. Patent 9,264,441, owned by Lionra Technologies Ltd, an Atlantic IP entity. The ‘441 patent relates to detecting vulnerability exploits of a network using a virtual machine and has been asserted against Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks, Crowdstrike, VMware, and Cisco.

View district court litigations by Lionra Technologies. Unified is represented by Michael Jones and James Pawlowski at Rothwell Figg, and by in-house counsel, Michelle Aspen and Roshan Mansinghani.