Aeritas wireless purchasing patent affirmed invalid in ex parte appeal

On May 11, 2023, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) affirmed the Examiner’s final rejection of all claims of U.S. Patent 9,390,435, owned and asserted by Aeritas, LLC. The ‘435 patent relates to using a mobile device to make online purchases based on received notifications related to products or services of interest based on the location of the mobile device and other notification criteria. The patent had been asserted in over 20 litigations but all cases have been terminated.

View district court litigations by Aeritas. Unified was represented by in-house counsel Alyssa Holtslander and Michelle Aspen. To view any documents for the reexamination proceedings on Unified’s Portal, go to https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/exparte/90014750.

Embed Block
Add an embed URL or code. Learn more

InterDigital video codec patent challenged in reexam

On May 16, 2023, Unified Patents filed an ex parte reexamination proceeding against U.S. Patent 8,085,845, owned by InterDigital VC Holdings. The '845 patent relates generally to hybrid video coding in a single block and has been designated as essential to SISVEL’s AV1 patent pool.

View district court litigations by InterDigital. Unified is represented by Raghav Bajaj at Haynes Boone, and by in-house counsel, Michelle Aspen and Jessica L.A. Marks.

To view any documents for the reexamination proceedings on Unified's Portal, go to https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/exparte/90015233.

$6,000 for Empire IP entity, IoT Innovations, prior art

Unified added 3 new PATROLL contests, with a $2,000 cash prize for each, seeking prior art on the list below. The patents are owned by IoT Innovations, an NPE and entity of Empire IP LLC. The contests will end on July 16, 2023. Please visit PATROLL for more information or click on each link below.

We also have third-party prior art providers giving our researchers a head start in the hunt! Click on each of the contests to find more from APEX Standards, IPscreener, and Google Patent Analytics.

US 6,920,486 - Synchronizing Data in Different Devices

US 7,567,580 - Edge Side Assembler

US 8,972,576 - Establishing a Home Relationship Between a Wireless Device and a Server in a Wireless Network

USPTO’s new Catch-22 targets Unified Patents in standing requirement reforms

In a recent op-ed in IAM, Unified’s General Counsel, Jonathan Stroud, explains the issues with the USPTO’s reform proposal, including how it singles out Unified and proposes restrictions that contradict the AIA and that have been rejected in subsequent failed legislative proposals. In the link below, Mr. Stroud argues that if the agency seeks to single out Unified Patents and bar it from filing IPRs, it must also scrutinize the lack of transparency and conduct of prolific NPEs.

Click HERE to read more on IAM’s website.

The Adoption and Benefits of Royalty-Free Licensing

As part of the efforts of Unified Edge, John Jarosz and his team of economists at the Analysis Group have published a paper on the benefits of royalty-free licensing. Read the abstract below and follow the link to download the paper.

Abstract

Much licensing of patented technology is royalty-bearing, allowing innovators to be compensated for their investments in researching, developing, and then in commercializing the resulting products.

However, over the last couple of decades, standards-based technologies have expanded, in part, due to the increased need for device interoperability, communication, and replacement. Though some of the licensing of patents covering such technologies bears royalties, royalty-free licensing of standards-based technology has grown increasingly common. Indeed, perhaps only a small percentage of today’s widely adopted standards-based technologies are subject to royalty payments. Furthermore, there has been a proliferation of non-standards-based patented technologies and protocols that companies offer on a royalty-free basis (e.g., Adobe PDF and Thunderbolt, discussed further below).

The advantages of royalty-free licensing of technology are obvious for competition broadly and can be numerous for both consumers and companies, specifically, those who benefit from, inter alia, reduced costs and lowered barriers to market entry. But royalty-free licensing can be appealing to innovators as well, as it can result in faster adoption, increased usage, and further innovations that incorporate the standardized technologies. Using some well-known examples, this paper examines the widespread adoption of, motivations behind, and benefits associated with royalty-free licensing in standards-based settings, and even, in some cases, outside of a formal standard-setting organization (“SSO”). Though royalty-free licensing has many perceived and actual advantages, it is not the optimal route for all technology licensing. It can be and is, of course, optimal in many settings.