$2,000 for 21st Century Garage patent prior art

On June 10, 2020, Unified Patents added a new PATROLL contest, with a $2,000 cash prize, seeking prior art on at least claim 1 of U.S. Patent 6,526,460. The ‘460 patent, formerly owned by Intellectual Ventures, is owned by 21st Century Garage, LLC, an NPE. The '460 patent generally relates to a vehicle communications system, in particular for a motor vehicle, having a plurality of equipment units for transmitting, receiving, acquiring and/or processing data for executing applications.

The ‘460 patent is currently being asserted against Hyundai. The district court complaint can be found HERE.

The contest will expire on July 15, 2020. Please visit PATROLL for more information and to submit an entry for this contest.

ETRI patent challenged as likely invalid

On June 9, 2020, Unified filed a petition for inter partes review (IPR) against U.S. Patent 8,867,854, owned by the Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI), as part of Unified's ongoing efforts in its SEP Video Codec Zone. The ‘854 patent is part of the HEVC Advance Patent Pool, as well as SISVEL's AV1 and VP9 patent pools. Raghav Bajaj, from Haynes and Boone, is lead counsel.

Visit Unified’s Public Portal for more information about its Video Codec landscape (OPAL) and standard submission repository (OPEN). To read the petition and review the case record, view IPR2020-01048 on the Portal.

Lighthouse "check depositing" patent determined to be likely invalid

On June 9, 2020, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted trial on all challenged claims in an IPR filed by Unified against U.S. Patent 8,590,940, owned and asserted by Lighthouse Consulting Group, an NPE. The ‘940 patent is directed to image-based check depositing technology. Lighthouse has thus far asserted this patent over 30 times since July and over 20 of those cases are still active (not including multiple DJ actions). The defendants in these cases are primarily banks and financial services companies such as Wells Fargo, Citigroup, Charles Schwab, AMEX, Bank of America, Capital One, Morgan Stanley, Ally Financial, JP Morgan, and BB&T. Wells Fargo also filed an IPR petition challenging claims of this patent in April.

Unified is represented by Raghav Bajaj at Haynes and Boone in this proceeding. View Lighthouse's district court litigation. To read the petition and view the entire case proceeding, see Unified's Portal.

Voice Tech Corp patent challenged as likely invalid

On June 5, 2020, Unified filed a petition for inter partes review (IPR) against U.S. Patent 10,491,679, owned by Voice Tech Corp, an NPE. The ’679 patent relates to remotely controlling a computer's operating system and applications using voice commands from a mobile device. The patent is currently asserted against Mycroft AI Inc. for using open source, voice-related technologies.


View Voice Tech Corp’s district court litigation. To read the petition and view the case record, see Unified's Portal. Unified is represented by Unified’s in-house counsel, Jordan Rossen and Roshan Mansinghani, in this proceeding.

200th PTAB challenge filed by Unified

On Friday, May 29, Unified Patents filed its 200th PTAB challenge (you can view them here), roughly seven years since the company first formed. Unified was created at a time of rising patent litigation and at the trailing end of the last economic downturn — litigation largely initiated by non-practicing entities (see historical rates here). At one point, over 90% of all high-tech litigation was initiated by NPEs (2015 report), many of which were using litigation costs to extract settlements. It came with two basic beliefs: first, to never pay NPEs; and second, to challenge bad patents owned by NPEs and seek to deter further investment in serial assertion.

Since its founding, Unified has grown into the third largest patent challenger at the USPTO (including post-grant reviews, ex parte reexams, reissue protests, third party submissions, and inter partes reviews). From a humble living room in Los Altos, Unified has grown from two to over twenty professionals worldwide (team page). It has grown from one zone (i.e., technology area) and six members to nine zones and over 3,000 members (for more, see Zones). Members include some of the largest corporations in the world, as well as, hundreds of startups, open-source developers, and others, many of whom can join for free (here). All members benefit from deterring the investment and assertion of bad patents.

In the interim, NPE litigation has decreased as an overall percentage of suits. In other words, it’s been working (more here). But even with over 200 challenges under our belt, there is much more work left to do to deter bad assertions and improve patent quality. Changes at the PTAB, litigation finance, economic changes, and forum shopping have led to another substantial upswing in NPE litigation. By continuing the fight and continuing to question the validity of broad, widely asserted patents by companies that contribute little to the economy, we hope to continue to create jobs, reduce the drain of nuisance patent litigation on U.S. companies, and effect the policy goals that Congress, the Courts, and the Founders intended.