Is Unified a law firm representing its members?
No. Unified is a deterrence entity, and acts independent of its members. Unified is not a law firm, and does not have an attorney-client relationship with members.
Does Unified ever settle with NPEs?
Yes. Should Unified determine that its goals can be better served by settling a post-grant challenge (or agreeing to never file any challenges), Unified will consider settling in exchange for an NPE license, though never for money. As with all aspects of its challenges, Unified acts independently when settling, and never provides members with advance notice of negotiations, draft settlement agreements, or actual settlement. For this reason, Unified will not negotiate unless a nondisclosure agreement is in place. Unified's practice of settling disputes springs from its long-term NPE deterrence goals, as it saves legal fees, which can be reallocated for other future deterrence activities. In order to have discussions we require executing an NDA which can be obtained here: LINK
What are the primary differences between AST, RPX, and Unified Patents Inc.?
Unified is the only solution designed to deter NPE activity and, therefore, Unified never pays any money to NPEs, whether to purchase licenses or otherwise. This ensures that Unified never incentivizes further NPE activity. Additionally, by focusing on deterrence, Unified is never put into the conflicted position of negotiating a licensing deal between NPEs and defendants in litigation.
How can members of particular zones be sure they aren't subsidizing other zones?
Subscription fees paid by a member with respect to one zone are not used by Unified for activities for other zones (excluding administrative overhead). If a patent or portfolio involves more than one zone, any activities and/or costs related to that patent or portfolio are allocated amongst the affected zones.
Is Unified interested in receiving demand letters and hearing about patents that are for sale in a particular zone?
Yes. For members and non-members alike, Unified invites and welcomes any and all non-confidential information regarding demand letters, threats of assertion, or patent licensing and sales.
Do members recieve advance notice of Unified's actions?
No. Unified (including its employees, agents and representatives) does not discuss details with its members concerning the preparation and prosecution of any patentability or validity challenge before the USPTO, including whether Unified will (or will not) file. To be specific, members receive no prior notice that Unified is preparing or filing any post-grant patent challenge.
Do members have any control over Unified's use of post-grant proceedings at the USPTO?
No. Unified retains sole and absolute discretion regarding all aspects of any challenge.
This includes, but is not limited to:
- Identifying any relevant prior art,
- Conducting an invalidity/patentability analysis,
- Deciding whether to file or what procedure to file,
- Preparing a petition or request,
- Prosecuting a post-grant challenge once filed, and
- Terminating that challenge (including settlement).
How does Unified successfully deter NPEs?
Unified uses the subscription fees collected for each Zone to provide a wide range of services. Unified conducts patent analytics and provides those analytics to subscribed members. Unified also monitors ownership data, secondary-market patent sales, demand letters, post-grant procedures, and litigation to track any NPE activity and NPE risks in each Zone. Unified also files post-grant procedures against patents it believes are unpatentable or invalid.